The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
Standard form of an equation is ax + by = c, which in this case is 5x + 3y = 14, or B.
Answer:
x=22
Step-by-step explanation:
the triangle in which x is in is an equilateral triangle.
44 is an exterior angle to that triangle.
an exterior angle is always equal to tbe sum of the opposite 2 interior angles.
because that triangle is equilateral
x =44 ÷ 2
x=22
2<span>√ ̅11is going to be your answer.
</span>
First equation simplifies to
y=(4/5)x-1
The second equation simplifies to
y=(4/5)x +1
So the answer is
No Solution
