1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr [31]
3 years ago
8

Which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source's conclusion is valid?

History
2 answers:
myrzilka [38]3 years ago
8 0
Comparing the conclusion with several other sources
mihalych1998 [28]3 years ago
3 0
You want to search for dates, the person writing the source, or the time to figure out if it is a secondary source or not. Do you see quotes in the article?
You might be interested in
Which troops invaded from the city of murmansk in ww1?
solmaris [256]
It was the<span> Allies troops. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
1:
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Explanation:

1) Freedom of Religion, Speech, and the Press

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

2 ) The Right to Bear Arms

A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

3) The Housing of Soldiers

No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

4) Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

5) Protection of Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property

No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

6) Rights of Accused Persons in Criminal Cases

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

7) Rights in Civil Cases

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law.

8) Excessive Bail, Fines, and Punishments Forbidden

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

9) Other Rights Kept by the People

The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people

10) Undelegated Powers Kept by the States and the People

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

6 0
3 years ago
When a wealthy landowner was given full control over land in the new world, the colonies were known as:
klemol [59]
When a wealthy landowner was given full control over land in the new world, the colonies were known as "<span>a. charter colonies" since this landowner would often obtain a "charter" from the king or queen. Not always, however. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
The Best definition of pastoralism is?
lions [1.4K]
A social organization that is based on livestock raising as the primary economic activity.
7 0
3 years ago
If you will answer wil get the branliest. Which best explains how rivers affected the interaction between prehistoric groups? Th
marissa [1.9K]
I think B because people always want to be near water so they would have to share the river for cooking bathing and more 

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the united states react when u.s. troops were attacked in somalia?
    13·2 answers
  • What does the quoted text demonstrate about the powers of government
    13·2 answers
  • Growing conflict between the north and the south 1850-1860
    11·1 answer
  • Help please:) with all of it. thank you
    6·1 answer
  • In what way did the Egyptian belief in the afterlife influence the cities that the Egyptians built?
    8·1 answer
  • In a paragraph of 3­–5 sentences, identify the most important achievements of Bill Clinton’s administration and explain what lim
    15·1 answer
  • Which countries celebrate Thanksgiving and when?
    12·1 answer
  • Excluding your immediate family members, explain if you are more likely to be genetically like someone who looks like you or som
    11·1 answer
  • Which event occurred directly after the Boston Tea Party?
    7·2 answers
  • Around how long after world war i began did the united states declare war on germany?.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!