Answer:
Barter; for trying to coordinate trades
Explanation:
The barter is the system where the goods or services are exchanged with another goods or services. Here no money involvement is there
Only goods or services are exchanged with the different good or services
So it is a complete non-adequate mechanism and it should be tried for coordinating the trades
Therefore the above option should be considered
Answer:
Individuals have used their time, creativity, and skills to develop intellectual property, just as others have used their time and skills to make products or to provide services. Intellectual property protection is critical to fostering innovation. Without protection of ideas, businesses and individuals would not reap the full benefits of their inventions and would focus less on research and development.
brainliest ?
Answer:
That's because as a country's economy grows, the amount of revenue a government can spend to pay its debts grows as well. In addition, a larger economy generally means the country's capital markets will grow and the government can tap them to issue more debt.
Explanation:
hope it helps
The credit balance in cash short and over at the end of an accounting period is reported as an expense on the income statement.
Income is the consumption and savings opportunity that a business captures within a specific time frame, usually expressed in money. Income is difficult to define conceptually and definitions vary by region.
The definition of income is the amount of money received by an individual, group or business during a specified period. An example income is an annual salary of $70,000.
Income is money received by an individual or business in return for providing work, producing goods or services, or investing capital. While individuals usually earn their income through wages or salaries, businesses generate income from the sale of goods or services that exceed their production costs.
Learn more about income here:brainly.com/question/25745683
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": A moderately favorable situation in which Sharon’s relationships with her employees are strained, but where the employees are still doing highly structured tasks.
Explanation:
Austrian organizational psychologist Fred Fiedler (<em>1922-2017</em>) proposed in his Theory of Contingency that leaders only have one leadership style and that they cannot shape it according to the different situations they might be involved in. Instead, leaders must be located in a situation that matches their style.
Since Sharon's leadership style is <em>autocratic</em>, she is likely to manage herself better in adverse situations where the subordinates still follow her instructions.
