Answer:
D) The manager should fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to conclude that the number of unique daily listeners has changed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scenario indicates the null hypotheses and alternative hypotheses are
Null hypotheses: The number of unique daily listeners hasn't changed.
Alternative hypotheses: The number of unique daily listeners has changed.
The null hypothesis is rejected if the calculated p-value is less significance level.
We are given that p-value is 0.0743 and confidence level=0.95.
Significance level =α=1-0.95=0.05.
As we can see the p-value is greater than significance level, so, we fail to reject the null hypotheses at 5% significance level.
Thus, we conclude at the 95% confidence level that the manager should fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to conclude that the number of unique daily listeners has changed
Answer:
The probability is 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The proportion analyzed by Amir is P(A) = 0.55
The proportion analyzed by Betty is P(B) = 0.30
The proportion analyzed by Carlos is P(C) = 0.15
The inaccuracy by Amir is p = 0.6% = 0.006
The inaccuracy by Betty is b = 0.4% = 0.004
The inaccuracy by Carlos is c = 0.1% = 0.001
Generally the probability of inaccurate analysis is mathematically represented as
=> 
=> 
Generally the probability that an inaccurate analysis, detected at final verification, was conducted by Carlos is mathematically represented as
=> 
=>
A. yes, because the mean is larger in the english book.
Find average velocity when acceleration is constant
Set up an equation with position and time instead
Find the distance between the start and end points
Calculate the change in time
Divide the total displacement by the total time
Solve problems in two dimensions
Answer= 13 _10= [23]_5
Please rewrite the same equation just put the 23 in the box
