<h2>The End of Apartheid</h2>
Apartheid, the Afrikaans name given by the white-ruled South Africa's Nationalist Party in 1948 to the country's harsh, institutionalized system of racial segregation, came to an end in the early 1990s in a series of steps that led to the formation of a democratic government in 1994. Years of violent internal protest, weakening white commitment, international economic and cultural sanctions, economic struggles, and the end of the Cold War brought down white minority rule in Pretoria. U.S. policy toward the regime underwent a gradual but complete transformation that played an important conflicting role in Apartheid's initial survival and eventual downfall.
Although many of the segregationist policies dated back to the early decades of the twentieth century, it was the election of the Nationalist Party in 1948 that marked the beginning of legalized racism's harshest features called Apartheid. The Cold War then was in its early stages. U.S. President Harry Truman's foremost foreign policy goal was to limit Soviet expansion. Despite supporting a domestic civil rights agenda to further the rights of black people in the United States, the Truman Administration chose not to protest the anti-communist South African government's system of Apartheid in an effort to maintain an ally against the Soviet Union in southern Africa. This set the stage for successive administrations to quietly support the Apartheid regime as a stalwart ally against the spread of communism.
Answer: Mas abajo detallo las accciones
Explanation:
- No criticar las acciones de otras culturas sin conocerlas
- Mostrar respeto y apreacion hacia las personas de otras culturas
- Preguntar cuando no se conozca sobre algo de otra cultura. Muchas veces cuando no se pregunta y se asume un significado, la otra persona puede sentirse ofendida.
- Mostrar interes cuando personas de otras culturas hablen
- Ayudarse mutuamente.
The disorder that Ty is showing would be obsessive compulsive personality disorder.
Answer:
D. Microeconomics is concerned with the fair and equitable distribution of resources among consumers.
Explanation:
Microeconomics is concerned with the study of how households and firms make decisions and how they interact in the market, it studies the behaviour of individuals and firms regarding decisions of how scarce resources are allocated. It is not concerned with the fair and equitable distribution of resources among consumers.
Explanation:
i am not indian...but maybe giving equality to those have different casts and social decrimination
for example looking down on others who are poor as law cast people..so the must have enforced equal laws for all of the citizens .... giving equality religion wise etc
