Answer:
The answer is C The difference between the value of the camera accepted and its value if it had been as warranted, medical costs for treating the grandfather's burns, and the cost to replace the grandfathers coat.
Explanation:
(C)When a buyer accepts goods that turn out to be defective, he may recover as damages any "loss resulting in the normal course of events from the breach," which includes the difference between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, plus incidental and consequential damages. Incidental damages resulting from the seller's breach include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt, and transportation, care, and custody of goods rightfully rejected. In this case, the grandfather incurred no incidental damages. Consequential damages resulting from the seller's breach include any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise, and injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty. Here, the grandfather is entitled to breach of warranty damages for the loss of the camera—the difference between the value of the camera accepted and its value if it had been as warranted—plus damages for injury to his person (e.g., medical costs for treating the grandfather's burns) and property (i.e., the cost to replace his coat) because they were proximately caused from the breach of warranty. Thus, (C) is correct, and (A) and (B) are wrong. (D) is wrong because the cost of hiring the professional photographer was not foreseeable. The seller was not told of any particular requirements and needs of the grandfather at the time of contracting nor would the seller have reason to know that the grandfather planned to use the camera to take pictures of his grandson's graduation and would hire a professional photographer if he lost the use of the camera.
Answer:
b. Exempt Review
Explanation:
Exempt review is a term used in academic studies that represents a situation in which a research or study may be approved by the institutional review committee (IRB), even with minimal risk. This type of research does not require much protocol by the IRB and can be approved for publication even without the need to convene this committee.
Answer:
Women run for office because unlike men have the strong belief in not to give up
Explanation:
1. Trade imbalance with Great Britain, which led to Opium imports into China, which the Chinese tried to ban but failed. This led to the Opium Wars.
2. An outcome of the Opium wars was British victory leading to the Chinese signing unequal treaties, opening trade, giving land to the British and forcing the Chinese to pay for the war.
3. The Europeans established 'spheres of influence' in certain territories of China, leading to the Chinese fighting back, to gain independence.
