Answer:
x=60.9°
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the height of ball from the ground is 150ft
The base of the pole with the ball is 80 ft from where Trey is standing
Trey's horizontal line of sight is 6 feet above ground, then;
The height of ball from Trey's horizontal line of sight is;
150ft-6ft = 144ft
To find the angle x, assume a triangle with a base of 80 ft , a height of 144 ft and a slant height that represent the line of sight at an angle x
To get angle x , you apply the tangent of an angle formula where;
tan Ф°= length of opposite site of the angle/length of the adjacent side of the angle
tan x°= 144/80
tan x°= 1.8
x°= tan⁻(1.8)
x°=60.9°
Answer:
Add 4 to both sides
x<7
Step-by-step explanation:
Your question is store uses the expression –2p + 50 to model the number of backpacks it sells per day, where the price, p, can be anywhere from $9 to $15. Which price gives the store the maximum amount of revenue, and what is the maximum revenue?
The answer is C. $12.50 per backpack gives the maximum revenue; the maximum revenue is $312.50.
578 bc 2 goes into 578 evenly

Notice that

So as

you have

. Clearly

must converge.
The second sequence requires a bit more work.

The monotone convergence theorem will help here; if we can show that the sequence is monotonic and bounded, then

will converge.
Monotonicity is often easier to establish IMO. You can do so by induction. When

, you have

Assume

, i.e. that

. Then for

, you have

which suggests that for all

, you have

, so the sequence is increasing monotonically.
Next, based on the fact that both

and

, a reasonable guess for an upper bound may be 2. Let's convince ourselves that this is the case first by example, then by proof.
We have


and so on. We're getting an inkling that the explicit closed form for the sequence may be

, but that's not what's asked for here. At any rate, it appears reasonable that the exponent will steadily approach 1. Let's prove this.
Clearly,

. Let's assume this is the case for

, i.e. that

. Now for

, we have

and so by induction, it follows that

for all

.
Therefore the second sequence must also converge (to 2).