Answer:
(a)
The equilibrium price is $75 per club
The equilibrium quantity is 75000 clubs
(b)
A charge a price of $50 per club. This would result in a surplus of 25000 clubs
Explanation:
Given
--- The demand function
--- The supply function
Solving (a): The equilibrium price and quantity
To do this, we equate both functions
This gives:
Collect like terms
Make P the subject
---The equilibrium price
Substitute 75 for P in
---- The equilibrium quantity
Solving (c): When the price is changed to $50
This means that: 
The quantity demanded will be:
Subtract the equilibrium quantity from to get the shortage/surplus
<em>Since the change is positive, then there is a surplus.</em>
<em />
The principle that Latasha caters for that her husband does not is that <u>d. Many </u><u>decisions </u><u>are taken using </u><u>marginal thinking. </u>
<h3>Marginal decision making</h3>
- Involves making decisions based on the marginal costs and benefits.
- A person will make a decision that has more benefits than costs.
By swimming more, Latasha would make get the benefit of being better at something she is already good at. If all she does is swimming however, she would incur costs of losing out in the other activities which would surpass the benefits of being good in swimming alone.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more about marginal decision making at brainly.com/question/13764545.
This is an example of "trade diversion".
Exchange redirection is a monetary term identified with global economic aspects in which exchange is occupied from a more productive exporter towards a less proficient one by the arrangement of free trade agreement. In a international trade circumstance, a business that can offer a lower cost item for importation into a specific nation has a tendency to make an exchange redirection far from another importer or nearby makers whose costs are higher for a comparative item.
Answer:
<em>This is a violation of the stored Communications Act.</em>
Explanation:
The Stored Communications Act (SCA), protects the rights of people and organizations from its participants to leak any information. This act works on the principle of the rights to be secure and protected.
As Sonya and other employees were using social media to chat about the company, the info was not being held private and came under the violation of the stored communication act. As a result, Sonya and other participants were fired.
Bright futures funds three scholarships.
