All categories

3 years ago

Kylie explained that will result in a difference of squares because . Which statement best describes Kylie’s explanation?

Mathematics

1 answer:

satela [25.4K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: that not a real question it cant be answered has to be missing something

Step-by-step explanation:)

You might be interested in

1. Mr. Hurst's house increased in value to $185,400 one year after he bought

katovenus [111]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Mark me brainliest if correct plz. If incorrect, you can give me 1 star to let me know. Thank you!

8 0

3 years ago

Helppppppppppp please

notka56 [123]

X= 180 - 157
= 23

Therefore, X is 23 degrees. A straight line has an angle of 180 degrees, so subtracting the given angle would give you X.

6 0

3 years ago

Which is true about the line whose equation is y+3=0

astraxan [27]

Y+3=0 is vertical line -3 on the graph.

Hope this helps there was no choices.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the circumference of a circle with a diameter of 8 feet? Use 3.14 for ON d=80 O A. 25.12 ft B. 12.56 ft C. 50.24 ft D. 1

Andrew [12]

Answer:

25.12

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula: 2πr, r = d/2

Given: π = 3.14, d = 8

Sub: r = 8/2

Simplify: r = 4

Sub: 2(3.14)(4)

Simplify: 6.28(4)

Solve: 25.12

8 0

3 years ago

The U.S. Census Bureau conducts annual surveys to obtain information on the percentage of the voting-age population that is regi

yan [13]

Answer:

We conclude that the percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that 513 employed persons and 604 unemployed persons are independently and randomly selected, and that 287 of the employed persons and 280 of the unemployed persons have registered to vote.

Let $p_1$ = percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote.

$p_2$ = percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1\leq p_2$ {means that the percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote does not exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1>p_2$ {means that the percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of employed workers who have registered to vote = $\frac{287}{513}$ = 0.56

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of unemployed workers who have registered to vote = $\frac{280}{604}$ = 0.46

$n_1$ = sample of employed persons = 513

$n_2$ = sample of unemployed persons = 604

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.56-0.46)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.56(1-0.56)}{513}+\frac{0.46(1-0.46)}{604} } }$

= 3.349

The value of z test statistics is 3.349.

Now, at 0.05 significance level the z table gives critical value of 1.645 for right-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of z as 3.349 > 1.645, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote.

5 0

3 years ago