Answer:
The answer is "Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves."
Explanation:
The declaration of independence stated that government should be elected by representatives in order to secure the fundamental rights of people to "life liberty and pursuit of happiness." This is possible on the basis of a social contract, where people agree to live together in a society, based on mutual respect of the principles enunciated in the declaration of independence. Since the government is the main guarantor of this social contract, people are willing to suffer rather than lose the form of government that protects their individual rights.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Governor Eugene Talmadge strongly opposed President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal programs as he opposed the programs that benefited African Americans and the ones that proposed an increase in government spending.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Eugene Talmadge is believed to have been a segregationist who was strongly against the idea of granting equal rights and status to the African American citizens.
- He was against the decision of the national government to increase the spending on the 3 R's of the new deal program that meant recovery, relief, and reform. He argued that that the decision of the national government to spend excessive funds on the program would bear more financial load on the states.
Answer:
b. expanding free trade agreements
Answer:
She takes long break from work and shirks her responsibility.
Explanation:
D) Based on equity theory, employees who perceive inequity can change his or her inputs at will. Therefore they evert less effort if they are underpaid, or exert more effort if they are overpaid. If Megan takes long breaks from work and shirks her responsibilities, then this would mean that she is trying to gain a sense of equity by reducing her inputs. If Megan had told her boss for a raise by citing her years of experience with such company, then this would mean that she is trying to gain a sense of equity by changing her outcomes. If she then decidesto interrupts her fellows and refuses to let her get any work done, then this would mean that she is trying to reduce her colleague's inputs. The argument is neither strengthened nor weakened by the fact that she accepts extra responsibilities but fails to carry them out properly.
The answer is D. Legal citizenship
i hope this will help you :D
