Answer:
It is because avoiding slamming the brakes will allow us to stop in a shorter distance as compared to the distance in which the vehicle stops if we slam the brakes.
Explanation:
When we apply the brakes in our vehicle by slamming them the car stops while sliding or we can say that the force that stops the car is the kinetic friction that sets up between the ground the tires of the car. While as when the wheels are turning as opposite to sliding the force that is involved in the deceleration of the car is the static friction. The force of static friction is greater than the force of kinetic friction as the coefficient of static friction between the tires of the car and the road is greater than the coefficient of kinetic friction. This larger force stops the car in a shorter distance.
Answer:
Tourism.
Explanation:
Tourism can be defined as an industry that is saddled with the responsibility of availing various individuals the opportunity to travel from one location to another, for the purpose of sightseeing and experiencing new cultures.
Basically, these individuals that travel away from their home to another location for sightseeing are generally referred to as tourist while the experts that guide them through the expedition or adventure are referred to as tour guide.
Hence, tourism is an important industry in many areas of the world, which is typically made possible by visitors (tourists) who come to experience the sights and culture of the area.
Answer:
Brundtland Report
Explanation:
The Brundtland Report, published in 1987 by the United States Nation .
First of all, it's not exactly clear what is "normal" - this changes from generation to generation and for example the traditional family used to be considered "normal" but now all other kinds of families are normal too.
Second, there is typically a big generational difference between family members, so it's hard to say that they function "as a whole"
For these reasons I don't think this statement is true.
Mandela means that someone who decides to take someone else's freedom is prjudiced and narrowminded. He can not be free if he takes away someone else's freedom just as a person who does not have freedom.
A person who takes away someone else's freedom is not free.