A strict constructionist is a person who believes that the u.s. constitution should not be amended by judges and that judges should adhere closely to the document's text.
A strict constructionist is the one who believes that the wording of the Constitution is incomprehensible and that the words of the Constitution should be interpreted literally. This philosophy is usually associated with federal jurisdiction when it involves constitutional issues. A strict constructionist usually specifies to a judge who interprets the constitution exactly as it is written. Anyone can be a strict constructionist, but the term best applies to those with political power.
Know more about a strict constructionist here
brainly.com/question/13594866
#SPJ4
The expectation that women will be emotionally supportive is an example of
"expressive role".
A woman's role in the family is an 'expressive role'. That
means that a lady's familial part is to give mind, love, love, security and all
the fundamental passionate help a relative may require. As opposed to men who
have an 'instrumental role' as the provider or earning member of the family.
Kosovo is the country where <span>the humanitarian goals of Clinton's Doctrine of Enlargement were best represented. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your great help.</span>