Answer:
The cost of the television is 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
x -----> the cost of the television in dollars
we know that
The cost of the television represent 100%
<em>If Matt pays cash</em>
then

so
The cost is 0.93x
<em>If Matt pays with a loan</em>
then

so
The cost is 1.1x
The difference between the two methods is

Remember that
The difference between the two methods is $49.98
so

Solve for x

The test statistic z will be equal to -0.946 and it shows that there is no significant difference in the proportion of rehires between full time and part time.
Given sample sizes of 833 and 386 and result of samples 434 and 189.

Proportion of full time=434/833=0.52
Proportion of part time=189/386=0.49.
Difference in proportion =0.52-0.49
TTF- i∈ rho=0
TTF+i∈ rho≠0.
Mean of difference=0.03
Z=(X-μ)/σ
σ=
=0.0317
σ=0.0317
z=(0-0.03)/0.0317
=-0.03/0.0317
=-0.317
p value will be =0.1736.
Because p value is greater than 0.01 so we will accept the null hypothesis which shows that there is no significant difference in the proportions.
Hence there is no significant difference in the proportion of rehires between full time and part time.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4
Answer:
The first thing you do is:
Step-by-step explanation:
How to calculate 60 divided by 19
Here we will show you step-by-step with detailed explanation how to calculate 60 divided by 19 using long division.
Before you continue, note that in the problem 60 divided by 19, the numbers are defined as follows:
60 = dividend
19 = divisor
Step 1:
Start by setting it up with the divisor 19 on the left side and the dividend 60 on the right side like this:
1 9 ⟌ 6 0
Step 2:
The divisor (19) goes into the first digit of the dividend (6), 0 time(s). Therefore, put 0 on top:
0
1 9 ⟌ 6 0
Step 3:
Multiply the divisor by the result in the previous step (19 x 0 = 0) and write that answer below the dividend.
0
1 9 ⟌ 6 0
0
Step 4:
Subtract the result in the previous step from the first digit of the dividend (6 - 0 = 6) and write the answer below.
0
1 9 ⟌ 6 0
- 0
6
Step 5:
Move down the 2nd digit of the dividend (0) like this:
0
1 9 ⟌ 6 0
- 0
6 0
Step 6:
The divisor (19) goes into the bottom number (60), 3 time(s). Therefore, put 3 on top:
0 3
1 9 ⟌ 6 0
- 0
6 0
Step 7:
Multiply the divisor by the result in the previous step (19 x 3 = 57) and write that answer at the bottom:
0 3
1 9 ⟌ 6 0
- 0
6 0
5 7
Step 8:
Subtract the result in the previous step from the number written above it. (60 - 57 = 3) and write the answer at the bottom.
0 3
1 9 ⟌ 6 0
- 0
6 0
- 5 7
3
The length of the rectangle is 0.25 or 1/4. This is because the area is equal to 5/8 or 0.625, and the width of the rectangle is 2 1/2 or 0.25. So 0.625/2.5 = 0.25 or 1/4.
Yes and no. It depends on the situation and how you're asking