Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation of the line is written in the slope-intercept form, which is: y = mx + b, where m represents the slope and b represents the y-intercept. In our equation, y = − 7 x + 4 , we see that the y-intercept of the line is 4.
Add me brainiest
It's a parallelogram so if one angle is 90 degrees they all will be because of transverse angles and all that good stuff.
So we're given the diagonal of a rectangle and one side and we're asked to find the other. The diagonal of a rectangle is the hypotenuse of the right triangle whose legs are the sides of the rectangle. So this is a Pythagorean Theorem question in disguise:
Answer: 140 cm
I don't recall seeing this Pythagorean Triple before.
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Answer:
( C ) 20 inch
Step-by-step explanation:
AB=28 inch ( given )
AP=26 inch ( given )
since that xy bisects and its perpendicular to AB and CD
then AX=48/2 = 24 inch
so by using Pythagoras theorem
then 26 squared - 24 squared = 10 inch
so XD+YD= 10 +10 =20 inch
