Answer:Active listening is the act of concentrating to what is being said with all your senses and not just passively hearing the speaker's message.
Adapting the techniques of active speaking to public speaking situation.
Firstly,one of the technique of an active listener Is paying attention.Paying attention entails focusing on the speaker's message with all sensory organs.By so doing,the countenance and gesture of the speaker will pass a message to the listener.This promotes effective communication by enabling the listener give an effe rice response.This technique can enhance public speaking because a good speaker must be able to provide an effective response to the listeners.
Withholding judgement is another technique of active listening that can be adapted into public speaking.It requires a listener to have an open mind to the ideas of the speaker.A good speaker must have an open mind to his audience.His messages should not be biased.
Another good technique of an active listener is reflecting the speaker's message.Dont assume the message,if the message is unclear,ask questions to erase any assumption.A good speaker should pass his message in clear terms.He should not assume his audience understands the message.
Also,an active listener should be able to summerize the speaker's message without missing any key point.In this regard,a good speaker must be able to summerize his speech by briefly talking about the content of the message.
Lastly,an active listener must be able to share the message of the speaker in clear terms to other people .This technique will make a public speaker learn how to communicate effectively to the listeners what he has learnt over time.
Explanation:
Answer:
A testable proposition or prediction is a <u>hypothesis</u>; while an explanation using an integrated set of principles that organizes observations and predicts behaviors or events is a <u>theory</u>.
Explanation:
The hypothesis is a proposition that establishes a relationship between the facts: a hypothesis is the establishment of a link between the facts that the researcher clarifies to the extent that he can generate logical explanations of why this link occurs.A theory is a set of interrelated structures (concepts, definitions and propositions) that present a systematic perspective of the phenomena specifying the relationships. It is the main objective of science, it is a combination that is projected in a systematic perspective of the phenomena in order to describe, explain, predict and control the phenomena.
Answer:
consumption of tea will <u>increase</u> , and marginal utility of coffee will <u>increase</u>
Explanation:
As Consumer consumes both tea & coffee, they are substitutes goods (which can be inter change-ably used by consumer).
Substitute Goods' price & quantity are inversely related. Such because -
- Price fall of a good makes it relatively cheaper & increases its quantity demanded, decreases other good's demand.
- Price fall of a good makes it relatively expensive & decreases its quantity demanded, increases other good's demand
So: Tea & Coffee being substitutes - If price of coffee rise, its own quantity demanded decreases & tea demand increases.
Coffee quantity demanded decrease means Marginal Utility of coffee will increase, as - MU decreases with more consumption quantity & it increases with less quantity consumption [as per Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility].
Answer:
Higher birth rates
Explanation:
Just took the test on edg
According to Khrushchev the results of the US remained unknown and a bit complicated. Khrushchev said the U.S. was setting up military blocs with other countries so that it could gain a dominant position in the capitalist world. They claimed as Khrushchev would put it that they were doing so to defend themselves against communist threat but that, according to him was based on a lie. In addition, the arms race was supposed to result in a balance of power.
However, it was obvious that a move like that could easily lead to war. In simple words, he thinks that U.S. is a capitalist state and would start a World War III. As is evident today, when nations start competing among themselves and start showcasing who has military might than the other, the danger of war increases.
