1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marat540 [252]
3 years ago
10

What is 1040A also known as?

Business
2 answers:
Dmitrij [34]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

The IRS Form 1040A is one of three forms you can use to file your federal income tax return. The 1040A Form was a simplified version of the 1040 form for individual income tax.

Hope this helped : )

mars1129 [50]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The IRS Form 1040A is one of three forms you can use to file your federal income tax return.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The greater the value of the marginal propensity to consume A. the greater the value of autonomous consumption. B. the greater t
just olya [345]

Answer:

C. the greater the value of the multiplier

Explanation:

As we know that

The formula to compute the Government spending multiplier is shown below:

Government spending multiplier = 1 ÷ (1 - marginal propensity to consume)

where,

Marginal propensity to consume refers to the change in consumption with regard to the change in income

So if the value of the marginal propensity to consume is higher than there would also increase in the value of the multiplier and in the same proportion it would be greater

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The MAIN reason suppliers offer cash discounts is to try to encourage.
goldfiish [28.3K]
The answer is A. Early payment

In Cash discounts, buyers will have the incentive to reduce the amount owed to the seller if they pay their liability faster than the Deadline

For example, the sellers can offer a 2 % discounts if the buyers make a payment within 10 days, while the actual deadline is 30 days
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. In which decade should you be saving for retirement?
diamong [38]
Whatever your age, you can make it happen.<span> Even those who start to save into a company pension at the age of 22 have less than an even chance of achieving an income equivalent to two-thirds of salary from their private and state pensions combined, according to the Pensions Policy Institute think-tank.   </span>
5 0
3 years ago
On January 1, 2019, in a merger transaction, Maxi Company paid $371,000 in cash for 100% of the outstanding common stock of Mini
boyakko [2]

Answer:

$224,000

Explanation:

Goodwill from acquiring Mini Company = Cash consideration paid - Fair value of Mini Company's plant and equipment = $371,000 - $147,000 = $224,000

The net increase in Maxi's assets only after paying the cash for Mini is $224,000 i.e. the goodwill from acquiring Mini Company.

8 0
3 years ago
Considering that Holmes and Balwani are the only ones charged by the SEC and the only ones facing criminal charges, what, if any
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

The investors, board of directors and employees for Theranos are not likely to have been completely free of fault in the more than a decade long fraud. The press has called the firm 'secretive' as it struggled to find any pertinent information about the it due to their closely guarded secrets. The firm operated a website that didn't have much on it and seemed to gag its directors, investors and others from talking to the press. These alone should have been a red flag to the investors and board. The PR person also refused interviews, neglected to answer questions about the owners/founders and turned down multiple overtures by the press to try and find out what was going on behind closed doors at Theranos. This encouraged the general perception that the firm was trying to control and minimise risk and possibly to retain an air of mystery. All of which was actually designed to hide the true workings of the firm, and this should have been questioned by all the people involved in the firm.

(Leuty, 2013)

The board as illustrious as theirs would have asked for supporting documentation and reviews for all the key aspects of the company and these would have needed to be audited periodically to ensure that the board can choose the best people in key roles and to enable good decision-making.

Investors also would have done a background check on all material aspects such as legal, ethical etc. before handing over large sums of money.

Employees involved in the actual fraud - falsifying results, using other tools to get the results that their tools were supposed to generate etc. were also aware of the issues with the firm likely from the very beginning.

All three groups possibly knew some or all of the aspects of the fraud and yet they did not come forward to disclose the same to the authorities or their customers as they should have. This points to a serious moral lapse amongst all three groups. They each as a group and as individuals in that group needed to take moral responsibility for the fraudulent activities being perpetrated by the couple. As the law goes, the prime players only end up being held accountable however it would have been ethically right for all parties that knew of the fraud to come forward and expose it.

Leaving aside the monetary considerations such as fleecing investors and customers alike, the products were related to the medical field, which above all others has a responsibility to maintain a higher standard of ethics. This fraud caused countless incorrect results that would have been used in medical therapies and diagnoses leading to wrong medication allocations and patient treatments. This in turn would have led to pain and anguish of the physical kind for so many patients, all of whom are the silent sufferers in this fraud.

Legally, pain and suffering cannot be quantified (just estimated) while this is the primary damage that the couple should have actually been charged with. This extremity of damage cannot be adequately presented in a court of law however and that brings us to discussing the morality of the situation. For all of the reasons stated above, the couple and everyone involved in enabling them in the fraud - the board of directors, employees and investors, should definitely be held accountable, if not in a court of law, then at least in the court of public opinion so that fraudsters like them do not get away without paying a price for their actions. All actions have consequences and their actions or lack there of should be accounted for.

References :

Leuty, Ron (2013) Secretive Theranos emerging (partly) from shadows. San Francisco Business Times.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A surplus exists in a market if​
    6·1 answer
  • Assume the indirect method is used to compute net cash flows from operating activities. For this item extracted from the financi
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true?a. The higher the maturity risk premium, the higher the probability that the yield cur
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following would the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics define as a discouraged worker?
    5·1 answer
  • Sally and Samantha have decided to form a partnership. They have agreed that Sally is to invest $195,000 and that Samantha is to
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following functions is most closely connected with the CPSC?
    9·2 answers
  • What makes you buy a candied vegetable or a candied fruit?
    13·1 answer
  • A new study shows that onions improve cognitive and heart health. This causes the demand curve to shift to the right, so that co
    8·1 answer
  • Beyond standard benefits like vacation time, sick leave, and health
    12·1 answer
  • An estate left the decedent's farm to eight grandchildren. Because no form of ownership was specified in the decedent's will, ea
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!