Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
Answer:
France.
Explanation:
France is the leading country in Europe in the production of: cereals, poultry and wine. Also, France is the second largest producer of sugar beet in Europe, behind Germany.
Answer: The Free Exercise Clause accompanies the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Free exercise is the liberty of persons to reach, hold, practice and change beliefs freely according to the dictates of conscience. The Free Exercise Clause prohibits government interference with religious belief and, within limits, religious practice. To accept any creed or the practice of any form of worship can't be compelled by laws, because, as stated by the Supreme Court in Braunfeld v. Brown, the freedom to hold religious beliefs and opinions is absolute. Federal or state legislation can't therefore make it a crime to hold any religious belief or opinion due to the Free Exercise Clause. Legislation by the United States or any constituent state of the United States which forces anyone to embrace any religious belief or to say or believe anything in conflict with his religious tenets is also barred by the Free Exercise Clause.
Answer:
The answer is C, fiscal policy.
The correct answer is C. All of the above.
Explanation
Naturalistic observation is a research method by observing a subject or group of individuals or animals directly in their place of residence. Another of its main characteristics is that the researcher must refrain from disturbing or intervening in the lives of those observed to avoid any interference that implies a different behavior than they would have if the observer were not there.
Therefore, it can be concluded that during a naturalistic observation the researcher should be prevented from having behavior that modifies the behavior of the observed group or individual; The observer must be prevented from making value judgments about the results obtained and from subjective or biased views, and the observer must avoid transmitting a message to the observed of how they should behave while they are observed because this can alter their actions. Therefore, the correct answer is C. All of the above.
