Answer:
$75,240
Explanation:
Given that,
Consumer price index in 1999 = 170
Salary in 1999 = $44,000
Consumer price index in 2016 = 290
Therefore, the required salary is calculated as follows:
= Salary in 1999 × (Consumer price index in 2016 ÷ Consumer price index in 1999)
= $44,000 × (290 ÷ 170)
= $44,000 × 1.71
= $75,240
Hence, the amount of salary have to earn in 2016 in order to equal your 1999 real income is $75,240.
Answer:
Explanation:
The expenses that Ryan can deduct for the business trips he had is calculated by summing up the expenses he had with regards to gasoline and the depreciation.
Cost of gasoline = (3,760 miles)($1,590/18,800 miles) = $318
Cost of depreciation = $4,800
Adding the costs will give us an answer of $5118.
Answer: $5,118
Ingredients such as sugar and butter would be examples of variable costs.
Fixed costs are cost that remain constant no matter the amount of output. Fixed costs examples are rent, loan, salaries.
Variable costs are cost which change with a change in output as the business provides more services. Variable cost examples are cost of raw materials, commissions and so on.
Find out more at: brainly.com/question/14083670
Answer and Explanation:
Given that Bond A pays $4,000 in 14 years and Bond B pays $4,000 in 28 years, and that the interest rate is 5 percent, we see that Using the rule of 70, the value of Bond A is 70/5 = doubled after 14 years. Now if its value is 4000 in 14 years, its current value must be halved. Hence the value is 2000.
Sinilarly the value of Bond B is approximately one fourth now because it pays 4000 in 28 years. Hence its value is 4000/4 = 1000.
Now suppose the interest rate increases to 10 percent. Hence the doubling time is 70/10 = 7 years
Using the rule of 70, the value of Bond A is now approximately 1,000 and the value of Bond B is 250
Comparing each bond’s value at 5 percent versus 10 percent, Bond A’s value decreases by a smaller percentage than Bond B’s value.
The value of a bond falls when the interest rate increases, and bonds with a longer time to maturity are more sensitive to changes in the interest rate.
Answer:
No, the cost of the annual premium for 10 years was less than the accident claims
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the annual premium is $1,200, $200,000 is the bodily injury coverage and $100,000 should be the property damage coverage
Also the $40,000 and $20,000 represent the medical cost and the car damage
So here the cost should not outweight the benefit of the transferring the risk as the annual premium cost for ten years should be lower than the accident claims
