Answer:
procedural unconscionability
Explanation:
Since Nate is finding the language of the contract difficult to understand. This is most likely a case of procedural unconscionability.
In contract law, procedural unconscionability refers to a situation where the unconscionability results from <u>inequalities between the parties in respect of age, intelligence,</u> and relative bargaining power.
Furthermore, procedural unconscionability projects an indication that both parties did not freely consent to all terms proposed.
Tax helps in stablising the price of product ; because tax is added to the price of product as value added that's why increase in tax system also increases in price of product; also businessmen needs to pay tax from their profit.
Answer:
The company should recognize a gain on disposal of $29500
Explanation:
The straight line depreciation method charges a constant depreciation expense per year through out the estimated useful life of the asset.
The straight line depreciation expense per year is,
(Cost - salvage value) / estimated useful life
Depreciation expense = (910000 - 0) / 8 = $113750
The number of years till 31 December 2013 = 6 years
The accumulated depreciation till December 31, 2013 = 113750 * 6 = $682500
The carrying value of the asset at 31 December 2013 = 910000 - 682500 = $227500
The gain/loss on sale = 257000 - 227500 = $29500 gain
<span>Gilleo should win. This is because though acknowledging
Ladue's police power to lessen visual disorder connected with signs, the Court
ruled that the law of Ladue "almost completely foreclosed a venerable
means of communication that is both unique and important." So the Court
held a "special respect" for a persons right to communicate messages
from his/her home.</span>
