Answer:
D) Both the landowner and the attorney.
Explanation:
The bank will succeed in obtaining a judgement against both the former landowner and the attorney. The bank can sue either of them or both of them, but it can only collect the $5,000 once.
- When the attorney assumed the mortgage, he expressly promised to pay it. The lender becomes a third party beneficiary of the attorney's promise to pay and can sue him if the mortgage isn't paid.
- The former landowner became secondarily liable to the lender in case the attorney didn't pay.
Answer:
e. The company will take on too many high-risk projects and reject too many low-risk projects.
Explanation:
By using the WACC for discounting purposes in case of the higher risk projects the net present value would be greater in such cases and also the high discount rate is applied. It is easily accepted but at the same time it also rise the organization risk
Therefore in the given case, the option e is correct and the same is to be considered
Answer:
Your correct answer ia A. debit to purchases
Explanation:
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!!!
Answer:
the total cost of ending work in process is $39,420
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost of ending work in process is shown below:
Equivalent cost per unit
Material = $301,600 ÷ 5,200 units = $58 per unit
Conversion = $405,500 ÷ 5,000 units = $81.10 per unit
Now ending work in process is
= 400 units × $58 + 200 units × $81.10
= $23,200 + $16,220
= $39,420
Hence, the total cost of ending work in process is $39,420
Answer:
Explanation:
a.) Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold / Inventory
Cost of goods sold= $25mill.
Inventory = $2mill.
Therefore, Inventory turnover= 25/2 = 50
b.) Weeks of supply held =( Inventory / Cost of goods sold) *52
**It's multiplied by 52 since there are 52 weeks in a year.
Weeks of supply held = (2 / 25) *52 = 4.16 weeks