The correct answer is co-workers.
This group represents an influence because on a daily basis we met each other in the office, work together, we share common goals and responsibilities, and the success of our jobs depends on the correct work of each of the members of the department.
A social group is the number of people that interact with each other and have commonalities, same interests and get together to accomplish something.
I really need to ask a question and it is making me answer one so im sorry
Answer:
Living in the United States, we're accustomed to hearing about regions. For instance, when I say I live in the Northeast, fellow Americans can probably surmise I reside in a place with snowy winters. They might not be able to guess my exact state, but if given a chance between Pennsylvania and Florida, I'm guessing they'll choose the right answer.
Like us, other continents also use regions to classify areas. Today, we're going to discuss one such region as we dive into the history, culture, and politics of the Andes and Pampas, a region way to our south that encompasses much of western and southern South America.
Despite the fact that the Andes and Pampas go together like peanut butter and jelly in most discussions of South America, there are some real differences between the two. First of all, they have striking differences in geography. For instance, the Andes Mountains are a huge mountain chain. Covering much of the West Coast of the continent, it encompasses Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Chile, and even part of Argentina.
Very opposite from the rugged Andes are the Pampas. Keeping things simple, the Pampas are the grasslands of South America. These famous grasslands cover parts of Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.
Proximate cause is the determination that the defendant's breach of duty resulted directly in the plaintiff's injury
A defense to negligence. An unforeseeable event that interrupts the causal chain between the defendant's breach of duty and the damages the plaintiff suffered. Allow the defendant to avoid liability because they are evidence that the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
I think it would be C hoped this helped
