Answer:
y=3x+3
Step-by-step explanation:
the line doesnt connect with a negative so the first and third arent it. And the line cross's with a 3 not an x so the seconds on isnt the answer. Leaving the last one the answer.
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
1 hour and 5 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer to your question is
1/4 kilometer = 0.25 kilometers = 250 meters
You answer is 250 meters