1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa [96]
3 years ago
14

Ancient Greek art and architecture blended which of the following elements?

Social Studies
1 answer:
stealth61 [152]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:the elements are abc do

Explanation:yea because u can say it is not the same as a third sentence.

You might be interested in
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
The limits of interest groups' influence might be gauged by the Democratic backlash against the ________, which tried to block t
Norma-Jean [14]

Answer:

E. AFL-CIO

Explanation:

The correct answer is option 'e' i.e AFL-CIO.

6 0
3 years ago
Bangladesh has the most garment factories. True or false?
romanna [79]
False i believe it's china
8 0
2 years ago
Where do international waters start for the united states?
Gala2k [10]
They extend from our shore into the continental shelf. Not to mention, we have an EEZ, or exclusive economic zone, which extends about 200 nautical miles from our shores. In this area, we have full economic jurisdiction.
6 0
3 years ago
Thee Florida Driver Handbook describes both legal and illegal uses of hazard lights. Explain at least one legal use of hazard li
lord [1]

Answer:

Legal use of hazard lights: if the car is in an accident or other wise disabled (unmoving) and located near a road (ie, the shoulder)

Illegal use of hazard lights: In heavy rain or any other time the vehicle is in actual motion.

Hazard lights are used to indicate and UNMOVING vehicle.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which two regions of Georgia would be best characterized as mountains?
    10·1 answer
  • Bailey makes $20,000 a year and pays 15% in taxes. Felicia makes $85,000 a year and pays 25% in taxes. This type of tax structur
    15·1 answer
  • If you wanted to nullify a quiz you took in history class, what might you do?
    8·1 answer
  • which of the following accurately reflects the government of India,China,and Japan? select all that apply
    15·1 answer
  • What is john ross's opinion about the way the u.s treated the indian tribes
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Jedediah Smith Wear his hair.
    11·1 answer
  • How do southerly winds along the coast of peru cause upwelling there?
    12·1 answer
  • READ THIS AND THAN ANSWER the stanza from "Elegy for My Brother Poet Filipino & Yuki Indian" by Vince Gotera. in Vietnam, El
    6·2 answers
  • Why did membership in the Ku Klux Klan soar in the 1920’s?
    6·1 answer
  • It was shown that people in colder areas, by far, are poorer economically than those in hotter areas.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!