Answer:
$4,000
Explanation:
The computation of the cash to be required to settle the liability is shown below:
= Purchase value of inventory - returned inventory which was purchased
= $5,000 - $1,000
= $4,000
It is a net purchase plus it is the cash required to settle the liability
There is no discount applied in the question as dates are not given so we ignored it.
Answer:
3,000
Explanation:
As the income will be taxed at 25% the income tax liability will be for that amount
12,000 x 25% = 3,000
The tax deferred liability is generated from a temporary difference. The company is paying less income tax today but will pay more in the future. Hence there is a liability.
The accounting reason for this treatment is to match expenses with the time they occur or the revenues which generated.
Answer: Decrease, Increase, Price flexibility.
Explanation: According to classical economics, a decrease in aggregate demand causes the price level to DECREASE in the long run. On the other hand, an increase in aggregate demand causes the price level to INCREASE in the long run. These changes occur because of PRICE FLEXIBILITY.
In a flexible market the forces of demand and supply determines the prices of commodities in the market.
As the demand Falls the prices also fall as the demand rises the prices of commodities also rises.
Answer:
Social companionship
Explanation:
Social companionship is a type of friendship or relationship between individuals who share similar likes and benefit from each other as they feel a sense of closeness doing things they like together. Donovan and Keith, who share some similarities and likes between each other, provide social companionship to each other as they hang out together as fans of a club.
Answer:
The auditor should issue a qualified report for the departure from generally accepted accounting principles.
Explanation:
A qualified opinion can be understood as the statement given by an auditor in conjunction with a corporation's audited financial statements in an auditor's report. It was an auditor's judgement that implies a firm's earnings reporting was restricted in scope or that there was a substantial fault with the implementation of generally accepted accounting standards (GAAP)—but hardly one that was widespread.
