Answer:
The ability of the Sumerians to organize their society more effectively by keeping written records of economic transactions
Explanation:
In the picture, we can see a clay tablet written with cueniform script. The subject matter is an administrative account of barley distribution. This tablet tells us that the Sumerians not only had writing, but they used this writing to create texts that were of public interest, such as a text that gives account of system of barley distribution.
We can see that the Sumerians were careful about the economic system of their civilization, keeping written records of many economic transactions.
The ruling affirmed that, in the United States, church and state were separate.
A- Engel v. Vitale
Just answered
I think the correct answers from the choices are options first and the last option. Aristotle's definition of governments would be rule by a few called an aristocracy and rule by many called a democracy. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
Genghis Khan was a leader with lot of great qualities, and he is regarded as a great leader, one of the greatest in history in fact.
Explanation:
Genghis Khan was a Mongol ruler of the Mongol Empire. He managed to unite the Mongol tribes and make them the greatest power of their time. Genghis Khan also set the foundations for the formation of the largest empire that the world has seen until then, only to be surpassed in size by the British Empire few centuries later.
This Mongol ruler possessed many great qualities. He was very wise, excellent tactician, loved his people, was establishing peace on the conquered territories, encouraged people of ethnic and religious backgrounds to collaborate and coexist. It is very interesting that Genghis Khan can be seen bot as a nationalist and as a liberal, from modern perspective of course.
His nationalist tendencies are seen in the fact that he loved his country, he loved his people, and he made sure that every Mongol has all of the basic needs for life secured. On the other side, his liberalism can be seen in the fact that he had nothing against people of other ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, but instead he was encouraging all people to put their differences aside, collaborate, and help each other for the benefit of everyone. All in all, Genghis Khan was an excellent leader, and a model as to how many other leaders should have been in that period of time.
Learn more about the Mongol Empire brainly.com/question/11288396
#learnwithBrainly
