Answer:
Hedonism and utilitarianism are similar in their evaluation of the goal of moral behaviour as some version of pleasure or happiness and the minimization of its opposite. They can both view pleasure or happiness as simple and immediate, or complex and matured. Where they differ is the scope of evaluation which justifies the behaviour as moral. Hedonism tends to be individualistic while utilitarianism tends to be social. A utilitarian must evaluate the happiness result for the total consequence of an action, which typically effects many people. A hedonist could very well throw consequences to the wind if the action feels good to him or herself. In a sense, you might consider utilitarianism to be model for social hedonism.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h3>Tocqueville lay emphasis on the fact that everyone in America was so much occupied in agitation and differences.</h3>
Explanation:
- Alexis De Tocqueville in his "Democracy in America" observed the continuous agitation of political and ideological differences among the Americans. He says that every American is always in some sort of tumult.
- By "No one could work harder to be happy", Tocqueville lay emphasis on the fact that everyone in America was so much occupied in agitation and differences that it stumbled them from growing and developing the themselves.
<span>B. reduced tensions with the Soviet Union
</span><span>The SALT talks of the 1970s helped in limiting the nuclear weapons of USA and Soviet Union in their arsenals.</span>
Answer:
The forty-eight states of the U.S. in the center of North America are called the contiguous United States or officially the conterminous United States.
"While the French, Spanish, and <span>Russian monarchies were becoming more absolute, the Glorious Revolution created a limited monarchy" would be the best option, since democratic revolutions during this time usually led to more tyranny. </span>
