1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pani-rosa [81]
3 years ago
8

How did the war affect the Loyalists?

History
2 answers:
GrogVix [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

State laws and mob violence prevented most loyalists from returning to their homes after the war. Women gained few political or legal rights as a result of the war. Slaves were freed in the south after 1800.

Explanation:

vodomira [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

it caused them to go into poverty

Explanation:

just took the test

You might be interested in
What abilities did William Pitt bring to the post of prime minister?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:William Pitt, the Younger, British prime minister (1783–1801, 1804–06) during the ... that he had no intention of accepting a subordinate position. ... between Pitt and Fox and also rapidly brought to an end Shelburne's ministry, ... Pitt clearly did not take the premiership as the King's tool, for his first step

6 0
3 years ago
Claim: Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence.
Mila [183]

Answer:

A. Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation.

Explanation:

Considering the claim stated in the question, hence, among the following options, the statement that could be used as evidence in support of the claim that "Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence." is option A "Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation."

This is because a CLOSE PROXIMITY between Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand means these countries or colonies have a good rapport with Great Britain. Therefore, it was easier to negotiate their independence instead of going to war (for example USA) or series of agitation and protest to get their independence (for example India)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the reign of Napoleon, many countries fought with France. What countries were France’s main enemies, and why did these co
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

The main opponents of Napoleon was Britain, and later joined by Austrio-Hungary, Germany, the Russian Empire, and many other smaller nations.

These countries felt a need to oppose France under Napoleon, for they themselves had monarch governments, and on seeing the French Revolution that led to the capitulation of the Royal government and civil unrest, which led to the rise of (what they thought) was a fanatical Bonaparte, they believed that, if their own people took a hold of the ways of the French, that they themselves would be thrown out of power. This led to the governments of these other nations to band together to throw Bonaparte out and reinstate the royal family to re-balance the royal structure in Europe.

~

3 0
3 years ago
Which illustrates a way to represent a single covalent bond between atoms?
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

A single covalent bond is represented by a simple dash. Hygrogen with Hydrogen looks like this: H-H

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
who believed the best economic system was one in which businesses compete to gain profit with minnimal or no goverment control?
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:   Adam Smith

Scottish philosopher Adam Smith (1723-1790) was strongly critical of the economic system that prevailed in his era.  Smith criticized what he called the "mercantile system" because it restricted trade and thus restricted economic growth.  The mercantile system believed the wealth of the world was a fixed amount, measured primarily in gold and silver accumulated.  The system promoted a nation selling its products abroad but not needing to buy from others, or imposing heavy tariffs if importing anything.  Colonies were created to provide raw materials and resources to the mother country and a market for the mother country's products.  Commerce was heavily controlled by the government through charters granted to specific trading companies.

Adam Smith countered by advocating a free market -- the opportunity individual businessmen and for all nations to increase their wealth by exchanging goods freely with one another according to what would become known as capitalist principles.  We also speak of <em>"laissez-faire"</em> ("let go") as a term for this sort of free-market economy, set free from government controls.  This term came from a French group of thinkers called the Physiocrats (meaning "rule by nature') who were working during the same 18th century era as Smith. The Physiocrats and Smith were in agreement about getting government out of the business of controlling business.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The innovation of using conveyor belts on an assembly line is attributed to
    10·1 answer
  • I have cities, but no houses. I have mountains, but no trees. I have water, but no fish. What am I?
    11·2 answers
  • Judaism spread in the ancient world primarily by
    13·1 answer
  • Why did President Lincoln reverse General Fremont's order to free captured slaves?
    5·2 answers
  • Which term does not describe American government
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Many humanitarians in the United States initially supported the<br> Spanish American War
    6·1 answer
  • Hi how or you to day
    5·1 answer
  • What was one effect of these events on the 1828 presidential election?
    6·1 answer
  • Countries settling in America included all the following except:
    9·1 answer
  • Why didn't the political revolution of 1830 and 1848 have an impact on Britain?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!