1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leva [86]
3 years ago
5

2. Olivia typically takes off her diamond ring while she works and puts it back on when she leaves. One lunch break, she leaves

it on her desk. Jenna, a co-worker, takes the ring and does not return it. Jenna has probably committed the crime of .
Social Studies
1 answer:
egoroff_w [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: Larceny

Explanation:

Crime of larceny is known as breaking law in terms of theft .It can involves several activities such as shoplifting, stealing art works , personal possessions of others, robbing automobiles etc.This crime deprives other people from their own belonging.

According to the question,Jenna has stolen Olivia's ring which she has taken off for work and did not return it to her. Thus, she has stolen possession of Olivia which remarks about crime of larceny.

You might be interested in
When people break up, they are likely to find it a _____, even for the person who wants out of the relationship.
BigorU [14]

Answer:check explanation

Explanation:

When people BREAK UP they are likely to find it HARD OR DIFFICULT to let go of their partner because it hurts so much even for the person who wants out of the relationship.

After breakup, most people think that getting back together is the next and important thing to do. But in reality, keeping your partner (again) is the hardest part.

When people are still in love, they have great patience for their partner's faux pas, they quickly forgive and turn blind eye towards their partner's error, but when the love is already fading they find it hard to heal errors and they criticize mistakes.

6 0
3 years ago
How does previous political experience and perceived perception by American voters influence elections?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

When asked which statement comes closer to their own views, most Americans (58%) say that “voting gives people like me some say about how government runs things,” while fewer (39%) say “voting by people like me doesn’t really affect how government runs things.”

The public is somewhat more skeptical when it comes to the ability of ordinary citizens to influence the government in Washington. Half (50%) say ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort, while about as many (47%) say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do to influence the government.

Can ordinary people have an impact?

Majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners as well as of Republicans and Republican leaners say that voting gives people some say in government, though this view is somewhat more widely held among Democrats (63%) than Republicans (56%).Those with more education are more likely to say voting gives them a voice in government

Democrats are similarly more likely than Republicans to say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington: 55% of Democrats say ordinary citizens can make an impact, while 42% say there is not much ordinary people can do. About as many Republicans and leaners say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington (47%) as say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do (51%).

Among the 13% of the public that does not identify or lean toward either party – a group that is far less likely to be registered to vote – just 44% say voting gives people some say in how government runs things, while 49% say it doesn’t really affect how government runs things.

Seven-in-ten of those with a post-graduate degree (70%) and 65% of those with a college degree say voting gives people some say in government; somewhat smaller shares of those with only some college experience (58%) or those with no more than a high school diploma (51%) say the same.

Unlike views on voting, there are no educational differences in the shares saying ordinary people can influence government if they make the effort.Scale of political efficacy

Blacks (58%) and Hispanics (57%) are more likely than whites (47%) to say that ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington, if they’re willing to make the effort. There are no racial differences in views of the impact of voting.

These two measures of opinion on the impact of voting and on ordinary citizens’ ability to influence the government in Washington can be combined to create a scale of political efficacy. Those who rank “high” on the scale say both that voting gives people some say in how government runs things and that ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort. “Medium” political efficacy includes those who hold only one of the two views, while “low” political efficacy describes those who do not hold either view.

Overall, 39% of the public falls into the high political efficacy category, while 33% have medium political efficacy and 28% have low political efficacy.

Political efficacy is higher among those with more education. For example, 47% of those with a post-graduate degree rank high on the scale of political efficacy, compared with 33% of those with no more than a high school diploma.

5 0
2 years ago
How does the photo explain the nature and significance of the social science disciplines?​
nalin [4]

Answer:

The nature and significance of the social science disciplines is explained below in details.

Explanation:

Social science, which is commonly considered as combining anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science, and economics, consists of the disciplined and well-organized study of civilization and its organizations, and of why and how somebody acts as they do, both as individuals and in associations within society.

8 0
3 years ago
Sara and a colleague are having dinner together. While they wait on their order, a Muslim family enters the restaurant and the w
Kitty [74]

Answer:

B. Discrimination

Explanation:

The definition of discrimination basically means the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race.

6 0
3 years ago
Why is there no resolution for the monkey's paw?
Semmy [17]
Mr. White finds the monkey's paw and wishes his last wish. The knocking immediately ceases.

Hope this is what you're looking for. Have a great day! :D
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Outwardly respectable adults who are frequent users of drugs may be successful college graduates who became caught up in the clu
    7·1 answer
  • To comply with the freedom of information act, you are required to disclose the names of disaster survivors when requested.
    15·1 answer
  • Mary and Evan are a married couple, and Mary does most of the housework. They rarely discuss household labor because their divis
    11·1 answer
  • During an election cycle, which of the following presents an opportunity for you to learn more about a candidate's political bel
    6·2 answers
  • Anquan is frustrated by the incompetence of his professor during class today, and it takes a great deal of effort for him to ref
    13·1 answer
  • Theories focused on learned responses to the environment are usually described as:
    9·1 answer
  • What philosophy guided Shi Huangdi?
    11·1 answer
  • What European river is represented on the map? A) Danube B) Rhine C) Seine Eliminate D) Volga
    6·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Chuge%5Cmathfrak%7Bquestion%3A%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\huge\mathfrak{question:}" alt="\
    8·2 answers
  • Would prophylactic antibiotics not be appropriate when the patient is concurrently on immunosuppressive drugs in veterinary med?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!