Answer: Transactional leadership
Explanation: Transactional leadership is described as form of leadership that has the leader with the capability of complying any member with punishment or prize by commanding .This process of working makes the followers stay inspired to keep functioning properly .
The prize or rewards and penalty on any follower is based on the task performance or job they are supposed to do. If the working is good they are rewarded and if they break any regulation or do not do their job properly , they are punished to make them disciplined towards their work .
Answer:
Aesthetic Distance
Explanation:
Artists will often portray fictional, mythical, and also reality-based scenarios but it is the attitude they generate with their artwork that enables viewers to separate their life issues and come to a new dimension.
This attitude or experience when someone is captivated by a work of art, like when watching an opera or a play in theatre where the person loses conscious of her life for a time and sets apart reality in a fiction or different reality that the artist is trying to portray.
In a work of art, the narrative being capable of mark a distance and set the person apart into a magical world where other possibilities of reality exist is then called aesthetic distance.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
