Answer:He was both, of course.
Explanation:He made Rome into the Empire it probably needed to be to continue to exist; the endless civil wars of the decades previous had not truly weakened the Republic’s borders, but they had resulted in Rome splitting into factions and substates repeatedly, and eventually if left unchecked this would have likely become permanent: there would have been several “Roman” states all bickering over the corpse of the Republic. So Augustus stabilized that situation, and created a system that would last well enough to endure the later civil wars, if barely, and last for five centuries.
But he also ruled completely and while following the forms of the Republic left no substance to them. Further, he made people enjoy that he was doing it, coercing and co-opting them into buying in to his new system. A long reign and massive personal will made this possible, but resulted in the end of much of what Rome had built up over the Republic. The idea that the Senate and People ruled the Empire persisted as a concept, given lip service, but it never re-emerged, and this was due to Augustus.
Tyrant and visionary, savior and destroyer, he was all of those things and much more.
Answer:
c) railroads had to charge everyone the same prices
It was Tammany Hall that was the location associated with political machines in the 19th century, since this was the place that many men would meet not only to discuss politics but also to elect members to office.
Second World War allied military strategy for Europe: Roosevelt and Churchill and their friends face in Washington in the year of 1941. <u>Explanation:</u>
- They concluded that they must first produce a huge attempt at beating Germany, then they would stop Japan.
- They needed to produce a large cross-channel attack of Europe from Britain.
- Roosevelt out three circumstances that he believed were critical: the amazing 'power of protection' of the Red Army; the huge equipment of American armaments; and the victory of Allied airpower.
