3 years ago

Kelly and Daniel wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct?

Mathematics

2 answers:

denpristay [2]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Daniel is correct and Kelly is not

Step-by-step explanation:

Basically, Kelly does not use the right terms needed to prove the angles are congruent but Daniel does.

levacccp [35]3 years ago

3 0

Daniel is correct, but Kelly is not

You might be interested in

1. En una biblioteca quieren comprar una computadora que

miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

678.74

that might be the question since I don't really understand what it says really

8 0

3 years ago

I will mark u as the brainliest I will mark u as the brainiest if u get this correct thx x

Elza [17]

Answer:

260

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula is base times height

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question 17, 19 and 21 ?

Vaselesa [24]

If this is Textbook work- use SLADER (the app or the website)

3 0

3 years ago

the length of a rectangular building is 6 feet less than 3 times t he width. The perimeter is 120 feet. Find the width and the l

garri49 [273]

Call the width x. Note that the length is 3x-6. We know that double the width plus double the length is 120, so we write an equation:

$2(x)+2(3x-6)=120$
$2x+6x-12=120$
$8x-12=120$
$8x=132$
$x=16.5$
If x is 16.5, the width is 16.5, and the length is $3 \cdot 16.5 - 6 = 43.5$ .

5 0

3 years ago

Alex wrote 103.903 in expanded form as 100+3x1+9x1/100+3x1/1,000 explain his mistake and how to correct it

11111nata11111 [884]

The 9 is in the tenths place so it should be 9x1/10. Meaning it would be 100+3x1+9x1/10+3x1,000

3 0

3 years ago