<em>Any</em><em> </em><em>two</em><em> </em><em>features </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>society </em><em>are</em><em>:</em><em> </em>
<em>1</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Strong</em><em> </em><em>mutual </em><em>bond</em><em>.</em>
<em>2</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Dynamic</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>progressive </em><em>.</em>
Answer:
holaaaaaaa HEHEEH so um do you need help
<u>Maitland and Gervis' study on goal setting and coaches found that, for goals to be effective, coaches should b</u>e engaged with the goal-setting process. The study was to use naturalistic inquiry and the social cognitive theories of motivation to identify and describe the motivational choices that players make as they go through the goal-setting process and examine the influence of the coach on this process. It means that goal-setting needs had to be examined in a broader context than goal-setting theory.
<em>In short, coaches should engage in an interactive and ongoing dialogue with players, taking into account the motivational needs of the players and their own to improve the effectiveness of setting goals as a technique, and hence their effectiveness as a coach.</em>
Answer:
The incentives favor running negative commercials regardless of what the other candidate does because if only one candidate runs negative ads, that candidate will have an electoral advantage
Explanation:
Strategic candidates air negative ads because the incentives favor running negative commercials regardless of what the other candidate does because if only one candidate runs negative ads, that candidate will have an electoral advantage over the other candidate which is why the two candidate will both would be happier if neither of them had run negative ads as opposed to both of them or one of them running the negative campaign ads.
