The accounting entries for Rippen Corporation is recorded as follows:
December 3,
DR Accounts Receivable (Burnen Corp.) $480,000
CR Sales $480,000
DR Cost of Goods Sold $320,000
CR Inventory $320,000
December 8,
DR Sales Return $30,000
CR Accounts Receivable $30,000
DR Inventory $20,000
CR Cost of Goods Sold $20,000
December 12,
DR Cash $441,000
DR Credit Discount $9,000
CR Accounts Receivable $450,000
<h3>What is Journal Entry?</h3>
A journal entry is recorded for the transactions of a company in the relevant period, the entry that is recorded is also known as the double entry. These journal entries are then used to prepare T-Accounts, an then trial balance is made and ultimately income statement and balance sheet are made.
The transaction includes a discount of 2% as credit discount for the payment being made within 10 days.
Learn more about Journal Entries at brainly.com/question/27076717
#SPJ1
Anomaly-based IDS pg. 250 is an intrusion detection system that compares
current activity with stored profiles of normal (expected) activity. While an
intrusion detection system that uses pattern matching and stateful matching to
compare current traffic with activity patterns (signature) of known network
intruders is Pattern-(signature) based IDS pg. 250.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
