The two significant issues regarding the ceo pay debate are -
a) the relationship between firm performance and CEO pay
b) the size of the CEO compensation in relation to average employee pay
Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) often receive large sums of money in the form of salaries and bonuses from commercial companies. This is sometimes defended by a peer-to-peer argument; roughly "our" CEO will be paid what other CEOs of comparable companies receive.
On the face of it, this seems like a bad excuse for morally outrageous compensation schemes, and thus this argument has been overlooked in the philosophical literature in the past. In contrast, however, this article provides a defense of the peer-to-peer argument. In addition, it is shown how rigorous examination of this argument sheds light on incentive-based and desert-based theories of fair wages.
To learn more about CEO pay from given link
brainly.com/question/16557894
#SPJ4
Answer: It is B. AlA
Explanation:ALA is open to all architects and professions related to architecture. Our members hold individual memberships and specialize in all types of architecture.
That is false. You must be able to hear well in order to drive successfully. If you are unable to hear well you won't be able to hear if police officers or any emergency vehicle is coming up behind you.
Hope this helps!!
Based on the scenario provided above, the banker's action is still considered to be legal despite of the fact that he provides personal details to the banker though it is also considered as highly unethical because using this information is his way of selling insurance policies in which isn't the best thing to do as a banker's job.
<span>Lawns would be the the needed land resource. Without lawns you would have no business. Starting a lawn care business in the desert would not be effective because you would not have the land resource of lawns with grass to cut. All of the other options are resources that you would need but they are not land resources.</span>