Answer: 35
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : A bag contains four red marbles, two green ones, one lavender one, three yellows, and one orange marble.
Total = 4+2+1+3+1=11
To find sets of four marbles include none of the red ones, we need to exclude red marbles when we count the total number of marbles.
Then, the total marbles(exclude red) =11-4=7
Now, the combination of 7 marbles taking 4 at a time is given by :-
Hence, the number of sets of four marbles include none of the red ones = 35
Given the equation :
We will use estimation to find the value of the given expression
So, the best estimation for the number 576 is = 600
The best estimation for the number 8 is = 10
So, the given expression is approximately = 600 ÷ 10 = 60
===================================================================
We can calculate the error of the approximation as following :
The actual value is : 576 ÷ 8 = 72
So, the difference is = 72 - 60 = 12
so, the percentage of error will be :
Answer:
The other side was decreased to approximately .89 times its original size, meaning it was reduced by approximately 11%
Step-by-step explanation:
We can start with the basic equation for the area of a rectangle:
l × w = a
And now express the changes described above as an equation, using "p" as the amount that the width is changed:
(l × 1.1) × (w × p) = a × .98
Now let's rearrange both of those equations to solve for a / l. Starting with the first and easiest:
w = a/l
now the second one:
1.1l × wp = 0.98a
wp = 0.98a / 1.1l
1.1 wp / 0.98 = a/l
Now with both of those equalling a/l, we can equate them:
1.1 wp / 0.98 = w
We can then divide both sides by w, eliminating it
1.1wp / 0.98w = w/w
1.1p / 0.98 = 1
And solve for p
1.1p = 0.98
p = 0.98 / 1.1
p ≈ 0.89
So the width is scaled by approximately 89%
We can double check that too. Let's multiply that by the scaled length and see if we get the two percent decrease:
.89 × 1.1 = 0.979
That should be 0.98, and we're close enough. That difference of 1/1000 is due to rounding the 0.98 / 1.1 to .89. The actual result of that fraction is 0.89090909... if we multiply that by 1.1, we get exactly .98.
.29 is bigger.
If you convert 1/5 to a decimal (or simply solve it!) you will end up with .2 or .20
Which is obviously smaller than .29
