Answer:
OMG YES THANKS IF U EVER COMMENT ON MY QUESTION I WILL KEEP PUTTING RANDOME STUFF MWAH
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: The last line is the answer
12 - 4x <u><</u> 20
20 - 12 = 8
-4x = 8
-4/4 = 8/-4
x = -2
New inequality: x <u>></u> -2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
6 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
lmk if you want an explanation
X = 4 ; x = 3 + i ; x = 3 - i
(If you get a zero that is adding or subtracting, you always need to write it twice but change the sign do they cancel out)
f(x) = (x-4)(x-3-i)(x-3+i)
Distributing the last two parenthesis first is always the best way to start off
(x-3-i)(x-3+i) has (x-3) in common so it can be separated to
(x-3)^2 + (-i)(+i)
(x^2 - 6x + 9) ; (-i)(+i) is always +1
(x^2 - 6x + 9) + 1
(x^2 - 6x + 10)
Now multiply this with (x-4)
x^3 - 6x^2 + 10x
- 4x^2 + 24x - 40
x^3 - 10x^2 + 34x - 40 = f(x)
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
The score increase was 35 points. They claimed an increase of at least 50 points. For a significance level of 5%, the z-score for the situation needs to be at smaller than -1.645. For a significance level of 1%, the z-score needs to be smaller than -2.325
The z score for our situation: z = (385 - 350)/50 = 0.7
The average score of 385 of Tutor O-Rama scores is not significantly different from the average of the other students SAT scores. The evidence doesn't support their claim of being effective tutoring.
