Answer:
The answer to your question is: I bought 7 snacks
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
beginning balance = $42 = b
lunch = $1.80 = l
snack = $ 0.85 = s
final balance = $0.05 = f
f = b - 1.8l - 0.05s
0.05 = 42 - 1.8l - 0.85s
After 20 days I spent = 1.8(20) in lunches = $36
0.05 = 42 - 36 - 0.85s
0.05 = 6 - 0.85s
0.05 - 6 = -0.85s
-5.95 = -0.85s
s = -5.95/-0.85
s = 7
You would set up equations for both the member and the non-member.
The member's equation would be: 384+8x (x being the number of rounds)
The non-member's equation would be: 48x+24x
then you would set them equal to each other and then solve:
384+8x=48x+24x
384=64x
384/64=x
x=6
they would have to play 6 rounds in order to pay the same amount.
Answer:
63 it's the closest
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:This answer is "512"
Step-by-step explanation: Keep multiplying the numbers times two. Such as 1 x 2 = 2, 2 x 2 = 4 4 x 4 = 8 and so on.
(E) "cast doubt on the aptness of a description"
Writers will occasionally include a term or phrase in quotation marks to question its veracity. The author of paragraph 2 denigrates the learning theorists by putting the word "experts" in quotation marks because of their "shocking" estimate of canine intelligence.
The answer is not (A). One may contend that the author's use of quote marks conveys surprise or even irritation. (B) is the wrong answer. The term "experts" being surrounded by quotation marks is not a show of "respect," but rather of suspicion.
The answer is not (C). There is no need to doubt the plain usage of the word "experts" in this context, even when the author may have reservations about the theories of the experts. D is likewise a poor choice.
Here's another question with an answer similar to this about quotation marks: brainly.com/question/1434552
#SPJ4
