1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julia-pushkina [17]
3 years ago
7

"Opposition for the sake of opposition is not good for nation" justify it​

Social Studies
1 answer:
pochemuha3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Opposition for sake the of opposition only limits our opportunities, our perspectives and the kind of understanding that helps us grow as

individuals.

opposition for the sake of opposition must be avoided, and the next government and opposition must work together to nullify the negative perception of our country

Opposition for opposition’s sake is a no-win balancing act

You might be interested in
The ___________________________ was a time when China was split into several competing kingdoms that were ruled by military lead
geniusboy [140]
B) Period is Disunion
6 0
3 years ago
Halp on these thx :)
Olenka [21]
1.b 2.c 3.b have a good day :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Economic analysis assumes "rational or purposeful behavior," which means that people will pursue decisions or actions
Ad libitum [116K]

I believe the answer is: that will increase their well-being.

during the process, people would weight in the magnitude of benefit that they would obtain from doing a certain action compared to the expense and opportunities they need to sacrifice to obtain it. If the benefit is larger than the sacrifice, then people would see their action to be rational or purposeful

8 0
3 years ago
Socrates believes that it pays for a man to be perfectly unjust even if he appears to be just.
Naddik [55]

The answer is True  and was found in 'The Republic: II'


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think the persians allowed the people they conqured to gonvern themself?
vazorg [7]

Answer:

The Persians followed a monotheistic religion called Zoroastrianism, which recognized only a single deity named Ahura Mazda. Based on the teachings of the Persian prophet Zoroaster, this was the official religion of the Persian Empire, although conquered peoples were allowed to practice their own religions.  They treat them well. They allowed them to keep their religion and customs instead of forcing them to adapt to Persian ways. ... They could let people know about problems or thing they had to do.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What protection does the 1st Amendment provide for the media?
    11·1 answer
  • This is the opposite of the new technique. many advertisers invoke a time when life was simpler and quality was supposedly bette
    9·1 answer
  • When the porters fight, they dive into their problems and talk about them at length. their fights are sprinkled with remarks suc
    11·1 answer
  • How would u describe america
    11·2 answers
  • Which elective offices is in the federal government
    5·1 answer
  • Which type of liability does a principal have when it authorizes an agent to engage in an act and the agent intentionally or uni
    8·1 answer
  • Your roommate argues that businesses should focus on the pursuit of profits. Your roommate is prescribing to which view of corpo
    6·1 answer
  • What country is being described?<br><br> A.England <br> B.France<br> C.Italy<br> D.Spain
    7·1 answer
  • Con some one help im not good
    8·1 answer
  • 4. in what ways do the activities of these organizations reflect the constitutional principles on which our government was creat
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!