I think it is D had no effect
Answer:
The naturalistic methodological approach is sometimes rejected in the field of psychology on the basis that psychological events possess attributes that do not exist in purely natural events. One of the characteristics of the psychological is its intentionality. Starting from the distinction between the basic psychological processes and the behavioral products that emerge from them, it is proposed that the former constitute a proper field of natural science but that: nevertheless, they lead to the generation of theories capable of explaining intentional behavior.
Psychology is the study of individual behavior, that is, it is the investigation of processes that occur in the individual, such as perception or learning. In psychology, therefore, you should necessarily focus on possibly universal processes
natural science methods and goals are probably not useful for studying people and social behavior; Instead of explaining to people and society, research should aim at understanding human behavior ... In this vision, the most interesting questions are not about the "reality of the world, but about people's interpretations of it.
Intentional behavior, such as contingencies of reinforcement, educational experience or the current social context, we can see that a “causal” approach cannot easily be rejected. For example, we can see that a behavior now occurs because in the past it was followed by certain consequences. However, even recognizing the presence of such causes, the interpretationist researcher will insist that they influence the behavior only to the extent that they have any meaning for the individual and according to the intentions and motives that he harbors (and hence the same "causes" influence different individuals differently). Ultimately, then, the most important factors lie in these meanings, intentions and motives.
The Federalist Party was in service between 1798 and 1801, and the Democratic-Republican Party was in service between 1792 and 1798.
The Federalist Party were proponents of a strong, centralized national government and a strong executive branch. Federalists did not support a Bill of Rights, supported an economy based on agriculture, believed that the Constitution was open to interpretation, and asserted that the government had the right to adopt additional powers. In foreign policy, Federalists sided with the British and opposed the French Revolution. Federalists supported Alexander Hamilton.
The Democratic-Republican Party were in support of a weak, centralized government fearing that a strong central government would lead to tyranny. The DR Party supported the Bill of Rights to supplement the Constitution in order to support the people. They believed the Constitution was a strict document that limited the federal government's ability to adopt additional powers. The DRP often aligned itself with France and admired the French's Revolution.
Answer: High supportive, low directive
Explanation: High supportive , low directive is the leadership method in which the supporting act is main focus and low instructional approach is present. The leader of this method provide help in solving issue by support and let the followers make their decision.
The situation mentioned in question describes that Maria is using high supportive and low directive techniques.She provides the followers the daily decision control and still try to help them in their activities by providing them assistance and support.She does not strictly instructs the followers.
