Options:
A.) Firm A needs to revamp its after-sales services.
B.) The sales of industrial goods are higher in Country X than in Country Y.
C.) The perception of quality can differ a cross countries
D.) Country X is a highly industrialized nation.
E.) Country Y has a lower average income level compared to Country X
Answer: C.) The perception of quality can differ a cross countries.
Explanation: The scenario illustrated above is most likely related to choice between users of different countries which may probably have different cultures, opinion, economic stability and various other reasons why they use the companies product.
This is because buyers in both countries are aware of the different versions of the product, However, buyers in one country tend to stick with the cheaper, older and bulkier version while buyers of the other nation preffered the newer and lightweight version. This is a clear issue of perception or ideas whereby some users think older versions of products even though may be less sleek in terms of appearance posses better quality than newer versions while some think otherwise that newer versions are always better in quality.
Answer:
I wouldn't invest.
Risk preference at least 50-50 chance of gain and loose
Explanation:
case of success the return i get is $40000
case of failure i lose $20000.
My analysis shows P40=0.3 of success
And P-20=0.7 of failure.
The probability of a loose is much bigger than the probability of a gain.
So I can't bear the loose of loosing 7 times if about 20000 and gaining 3 times of about 40000 it doesn't balance.
My loose accumulating to 140000
While my gain is 120000.
I can't invest
Answer:
The correct option here is B)
Explanation:
The non compete clause is an agreement between an employer and employee ( as it is in this question between Roger and HR consulting firm ) , where an employee agree to the wishes of employer to not to work for firms which are competing against the employer in the same market.
Answer: The economy drastically slows down as money loses its buying power.
Explanation:
Answer:
1) The fixed overhead production-volume variance is $14400 favourable.
2) The fixed overhead spending variance is $9000 unfavourable.
Explanation:
1)
Fixed overhead production volume variance
= amount applied * amount budgeted
= 144000/30000
= 4.80 per unit
= 4.80*33000 - 144000
= $14400 favourable
Therefore, The fixed overhead production-volume variance is $14400 favourable.
2)
fixed overhead spending variance
= actual overhead - budgeted overhead
= 153000 - 144000
= $9000 unfavourable
Therefore, The fixed overhead spending variance is $9000 unfavourable.
