Which do you think is more valuable in expressing the relationship between calories and sugarlong dashthe covariance or the coef
ficient of correlation? Explain. A. The covariance is more valuable. It is not susceptible to the negative effects of lurking variables. B. The correlation is more valuable. It is the better measure for positive relationships. C. The correlation is more valuable. It can be used to determine the relative strength of a linear relationship. D. The covariance is more valuable. It is an exact measure of the strength of a linear relationship.
The correlation is more valuable. It can be used to determine the relative strength of a linear relationship.
Explanation:
When you talk about finding a relationship between two quantitative variables such as calories and sugar, then the best that can be used in expressing this relationship is correlation. Correlational research is very useful because it helps in discovering the strength and directions that exist in a relationship between two variables. Although it does not say much about the cause and effect, it is used as a measure of linear relationship between two variables.
Covariance can mainly show the direction between two variables, but cannot be employed when trying to calculate the strength of the relationship between the variables. Correlation coefficient does a better job in measuring the strength of relationships between two quantitative variables.
Positive correlation, muscular endurance and cardiovascular endurance because she is doing more and she is increasing her pacing from slow to medium to fast
While cardio does burn calories and helps aid in weight loss, combining it with at least two to three days a week of strength training workouts can increase the rate at which you lose weight.
Absolute strength: Absolute strength: Strength measured by how much weight or resistance you can overcome regardless of your body size. It’s muscular endurance
