Answer:
Total revenue to be reported by Solitare over the two months is $249.
Explanation:
Total revenue from:
Sale to Wizard Inc. = $160
<u>+ Sale to Spyder Corp. = $89</u>
Total revenue = $249
Solitaire will have to recognize sales discount from the early payment by Wizard Inc. on January 14, which was 8 days from the date of sale (January 6). Based on Solitaire's credit term to Wizard Inc., Wizard Inc. is entitled to a 2% sales discount upon payment within the 30 days from date of sale.
Sales discount to Wizard Inc. = $160 x 2% = $3.20
This will be deducted to the total revenue to arrive at a net revenue of $246 ($249 - $3.2)
Answer:
14.6 years
Explanation:
Applying an early depreciation rate 'r = 18%', the value of an automobile originally valued at $18,000, after 't' years, is given by:
The number of years required for which V(t) = $1,000 is:
It will take 14.6 years for the value of the automobile to decrease to $1,000.
Answer:
a) operating activity (added to net income)
Explanation:
Operating activities are those activities that deals to day to day expenses and revenues i.e. salary expense, advance cash received,etc. Also it records the changes in working capital amounts
Here the receipt on dividend held on stock investment considered to be an operating activity and since it is a cash inflow so the same is to be included in the net income
Therefore option a is correct
Answer:
3.8%
Explanation:
3 year bonds yielding 3.2%
6 year bonds yielding 5.0
Annual pay bond 4 years
Yielding bond+[(Annual pay bond- Bonds years)/bond years]×(Yielding bond-Yeilding bonds)
Let plug in the formula
Interpolating: 3.2% + [(4 - 3) / (6 - 3)] × (5.0% - 3.2%)
=3.2%+[1/3×(1.8%)]
= 3.2%+(0.33333×1.8%)
=3.2%+0.006
=0.032+0.006
=0.038×100
=3.8%
Alternatively,
Interpolating: 3.2% + [(4 - 3) / (6 - 3)] × (5.0% - 3.2%) =3.8%
In this case the analyst should estimate a YTM for the non-traded bond that is closest to: 3.8%
Answer:
In the clarification section down, the definition including its concern is mentioned.
Explanation:
In terms of strategy, two important components necessarily entail an "Agreement."
<u>Step 1:</u> Approval + Bid = Agreement
<u>Step 2: </u>Agreement + Enforceability = Contract.
- Throughout water to establish a legal Arrangement or Contract, those would be the two underlying equations to be met.
- Going to come to something like the case's reality, The counsel for Kemper addressed to Statewide Claims Management, Brown's insurance company agent, calling for "all the premium money something which Mr. Brown seems to be under his insurance contract."
- Statewide decided to send the document and perhaps freedom of the individual to Kemper throughout reaction to the aforementioned request, however, they pointed to Kemper's current requirement that she should put money during an emergency fund concerning anything and everything outstanding liens.
- Kemper disagreed with all of the above assumptions as well as denied the proposal, arguing that perhaps the response from Nationwide was a counteroffer. If we correctly examine the aforementioned situation, without even any discussion, we will realize that it is indeed a pure "Counter Bid."
- Why whenever the offender becomes encouraged with just 2 choices, YES/NO, whenever an Offeror makes an object to something like the Offeree. and then when the promise offers a conditional response, it destroys the initial offer so it corresponds to Counter Offer.
- In quite a similar manner, the Nationwide reaction to Kemper's letter here alone leads to "Counter Bid" and becomes an Absolute acceptance, but not. i.e., there is no approval of an invitation, and no deal remains.
There is, however, no "Acceptance" to either the original Bid, and therefore no binding mediation agreements between Nationwide and Kemper have been established.
