Answer:
cut back the expansion of labor as a trade off between higher salaries but fewer workers.
Explanation:
If the employer believes that he is paying above average wages, he will try to reduce labor costs. Since unions are specially good in preventing massive layoffs, the other alternative left for the employer is to not hire new employees, or reduce the number of new employees that he expected to hire.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Given that,
Price of low-quality apples = $1 per pound
Price of high-quality apples = $4 per pound
Marginal utility of low-quality apples = 3 utils
Marginal utility of high-quality apples = 12 utils
Equimarginal:
(Marginal utility of low quality apples ÷ Price per apple) = (Marginal utility of high quality apples ÷ Price per apples)
(3 utils ÷ $1) = (12 utils ÷ $4)
3 = 3
Yes, Timmy is maximizing his utility as his equimarginal utility is same for both the goods as shown above.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
The answer is: Interpersonal skills
Explanation:
Interpersonal skills, also known as the soft skills, refers to the behavior of an individual while interacting or communicating with others. Interpersonal skills can also be described as the ability of an employee to work with others.
Interpersonal skills include effective communication, active listening, deportment, attitude and dispute resolving.
<u>Therefore, the given example illustrates </u><u>Interpersonal skills.</u>
