Answer:
A) there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.
Explanation:
Wayne hadn't done anything wrong before in the company, his behavior at the workplace could be described as very good; no complaint in 20 years and no criminal record what so ever. If Wayne was frustrated about his job, he disguised it very well. No one can predict this type of behavior if the person shows no prior signs of violence or frustration.
Answer: The market will experience more demand and the prices of goods will rise up.
Explanation: According to a law, the higher the demand , there is a corresponding increase in the price. As a result of the lower interest rate of mortgage loans, more people have access to loan which leads to an astronomical increase in the number of house owners. Market experience more demand and therefore the prices of housing will rise up. It’s only obeying the law of demand and supply which states that the greater the demand, the higher the price.
Answer:
Explanation:
Forward excahnge rate/spot exchange rate = (1+rh)/(1+rf)
rh - periodic interest rate in the home currency
rf - periodic interest rate in the foreign currency
Forward/90 = [1+1%*180/360]/[1+2%*180/360]
Forward = 1.005/1.01 * 90 = 89.55
Forward rate is 89.55 yen/$
First, you have to calculate the amount of tuition when the student reaches age 18. Do this by multiplying $11,000 by 1.07 each year from age 12 until it reaches age 18. Thus, 7 times.
At age 18: 16,508
At age 19: 17,664
At age 20: 18,900
At age 21: 20,223
Then, we use this formula:
A = F { i/{[(1+i)^n] - 1}}
where A is the monthly deposit each year, F is the half amount of the tuition each year illustrated in the first part of this solution, n is the number of years lapsed.
At age 18:
A = (16508/2) { 0.04/{[(1+0.04)^6] - 1}} = $1,244.389 deposit for the 1st year
Ate age 19
A = (17664/2) { 0.04/{[(1+0.04)^7] = $1,118 deposit for the 2nd year
At age 20:
A = (18900/2) { 0.04/{[(1+0.04)^8] = $1,025 deposit for the 3rd year
At age 21:
A = (18900/2) { 0.04/{[(1+0.04)^8] = $955 deposit for the 4th year
Answer:
Andrew Jackson (AJ for short) was a statesman. He reached the height of this career when he became the 7th President of the United States (POTUS, having served as a soldier and a general in the United States Army). His administration spanned two terms of 4 years each (1829 to 1837)
In direct reference to the question, it can be said that due to his action, he was rather tyrannical than monarchial.
Explanation
On the overall, AJ is regarded by may historians favorably due to his many big wins. Some of those wins which he achieved as POTUS are:
- The payment of a long standing national debt
- the conclusion of the "most favored nation" treaty with the United Kingdom, which settled claims of damages against France from the Napoleonic Wars,
- Prevention of the renewal of the charter of the Second Bank of the United States which was deemed as corrupt established created to enrich the wealthy at the expense of the plebian class and
- the recognition Texas as a Republic. It may be worthy of note that he was the first POTUS to have survived an assassination attempt as a sitting president.
Irrespective of the above, his career was marred by two major dents:
- The endorsement of the of the 1830 Indian Removal Act which forced many Native American tribes in the South to a space that became known as the Indian Territory. The forceful relocation was deemed necessary by the Blue Bloods (White Population) and resulted in mass suffering, mass death by many who where diseased during the forced relocation.
- The Nullification Crises: For some reason, the congress approved a bill which by itself was designed to fail or be disapproved. It placed a huge tariff (as much as 45%, a historic high) on the Southern Cotton Farmers. The bill became known as the "Tariff of Abominations". He later conceded to several downward revisions of the tariff, first to 27% and further downwards later but not after it had caused a lot of rift between the state of South Carolina and the Federal Government where in the South Carolina had declared the bill unconstitutional. This call out against the Federal Government became known as the Nullification Crises.
Cheers
