I believe the correct answer is C. The adversarial system focuses mainly on the opposing parties.
Based on the number of guidelines for <em>communicating with children about divorce</em> by Ellen Galinsky and Judy David, the one which is NOT a part of the guidelines is to:
- Explain that things will be better soon
According to the given question, we are asked to state the statement which is NOT a part of the guidelines by<em> Ellen and Judy David</em> about telling children about divorce.
As a result of this, we can see that based on the guidelines which were given by Ellen Galinsky and Judy David about <em>communicating with children about divorce</em>, it is important to let them know what is going on, but <em>not to explain that things will be better soon</em>, as this was NOT one of the guidelines.
Read more about divorce here:
brainly.com/question/7138705
It’s C. He bacons president after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln
To make you see yourself that others cant
Answer: According to Tetlock argument, Expert with good predictive power should be willing to;
• EXPLORE DIVERSE INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL MODEL
• CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM
• BE COMFORTABLE WITH COMPLEXITY AND UNCERTAINTY.
Therefore option b,c,e is the right answer.
Explanation: The predictive power of a scientist is the power a scientist has to generate a testable prediction, thereby making its theory to be a testable prediction.
For an expert to have good predictive power it must have the ability to explore diverse information and analytical model, because when you explore different information and analyse it in the best form, you will be able to postulate more information and discoveries, which can help you to predict a testable theory. By exploring you are trying to challenge conventional wisdom, of why should this be this?, You may get confused and uncertain at a point. But if he you have a good predictive power, you can be able to absorb it all to achieve your discovery and produce a scientific theory with a predictive power.
