All categories

3 years ago

Sarah described the following situation:

Mathematics

1 answer:

Nataly_w [17]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: B.) This is an example of causation but not correlation.

Step-by-step explanation: Causation is a cause and effect, because fertilizer was added to one plant, it's leaf color was improved.

You might be interested in

There are 12 boys and 13 girls. What is the ratio from boys to girls

ollegr [7]

Answer: 12 boys: 13 Girls

Step-by-step explanation: Nothing much really.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Anumber is decreased by 55% to 54. What is the originally amount

harina [27]

Answer:

1.8181818181818181818181818181818

7 0

4 years ago

A common form for rational numbers means to change all of the numbers to a decimal or a fraction

Alex787 [66]

Answer:

I think its......false (I tried)

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose Upper F Superscript prime Baseline left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis equals 3 x Superscript 2 Baseline plus 7 and Upp

Sedaia [141]

It looks like you're given

F'(x) = 3x² + 7

and

F (0) = 5

and you're asked to find F(b) for the values of b in the list {0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 2.0}.

The first is done for you, F (0) = 5.

For the remaining b, you can solve for F(x) exactly by using the fundamental theorem of calculus:

$F(x)=F(0)+\displaystyle\int_0^x F'(t)\,\mathrm dt$

$F(x)=5+\displaystyle\int_0^x(3t^2+7)\,\mathrm dt$

$F(x)=5+(t^3+7t)\bigg|_0^x$

$F(x)=5+x^3+7x$

Then F (0.1) = 5.701, F (0.2) = 6.408, F (0.5) = 8.625, and F (2.0) = 27.

On the other hand, if you're expected to approximate F at the given b, you can use the linear approximation to F(x) around x = 0, which is

F(x) ≈ L(x) = F (0) + F' (0) (x - 0) = 5 + 7x

Then F (0) = 5, F (0.1) ≈ 5.7, F (0.2) ≈ 6.4, F (0.5) ≈ 8.5, and F (2.0) ≈ 19. Notice how the error gets larger the further away b gets from 0.

A better numerical method would be Euler's method. Given F'(x), we iteratively use the linear approximation at successive points to get closer approximations to the actual values of F(x).

Let y(x) = F(x). Starting with x₀ = 0 and y₀ = F(x₀) = 5, we have

x₁ = x₀ + 0.1 = 0.1

y₁ = y₀ + F'(x₀) (x₁ - x₀) = 5 + 7 (0.1 - 0) → F (0.1) ≈ 5.7

x₂ = x₁ + 0.1 = 0.2

y₂ = y₁ + F'(x₁) (x₂ - x₁) = 5.7 + 7.03 (0.2 - 0.1) → F (0.2) ≈ 6.403

x₃ = x₂ + 0.3 = 0.5

y₃ = y₂ + F'(x₂) (x₃ - x₂) = 6.403 + 7.12 (0.5 - 0.2) → F (0.5) ≈ 8.539

x₄ = x₃ + 1.5 = 2.0

y₄ = y₃ + F'(x₃) (x₄ - x₃) = 8.539 + 7.75 (2.0 - 0.5) → F (2.0) ≈ 20.164

4 0

3 years ago

Given the following tax structure, what minimum tax would need to be assessed on shameika to make the tax progressive with respe

stira [4]

It seems that you have missed some important details for us to answer this question, but hope my answer helps. So given the following tax structure, the minimum tax that would we needed to be assessed on Shameika to make the tax progressive with respect to average tax rates is $3,363. Hope this helps.

6 0

3 years ago