Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey there!!!
According to the question,
Angle P is three less than twice less of an angle Q.
Then, let angle Q be x then angle P is 2x-3.
Now, it has also given that they are supplementary angle.
We know that the sum of supplementary angle is 180°.
Therefore, x+ 2x - 3°=180°.
Or, 3x = 180°-3°
Or, x = 177°/3
Therefore the measure of angle Q is 59° and P is 2×59°-3°= 121°.
Hope it helps....
It is .15 because 1/8 in decimal forma is .125
Answer:
The seconf option
x = 0, 2, 4
y = 3,5,7
Step-by-step explanation:
plug in your x and y points into the equation and they should be the same of both sides
ex (0,3)
3 = 0 + 3
^y ^x