The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Congressman has to respond to the Big Pizza Lobby taking these considerations in mind.
Congressman has to realize the impact of the presence of this big "company" in the market. Not only for other industries that cannot compete with this huge company but the impact it has on consumers.
The congressman would propose the kind of bill that benefits free trade, competence, and benefits consumers in a free market.
The big company is not going to stay "arms-folded." The company is going to hire lobbyists to negotiate with congressmen in order to promote its particular agendas and personal interests.
Of course, the big company wants to change the rules against it, and modify them to facilitate their interests. The negotiations can make legislators doubt or rethink a regulation. That is when Congressman has to think to support the interests of citizens, who were the ones who took him/her to office in the elections. So congressmen serve the people, not large companies.
Women's speech reflects women's traditional lesser power in American society.
<h3><u>Explanation:
</u></h3>
According to Lakoff’s book, the way people communicate holds a clear distinction about who holds the power. The language used by both genders depicts gender inequalities and also leads to a lack of women’s power in areas that involves women. In addition, Lakoff states that the language women use to communicate indicate their inferiority and weakness.
She recognized gestures such as hedging, super polite forms, tag questions and many more in women’s language. While this is notable there has been debate regarding gender inequalities arising from language and communication.
The workers are specialized if they perform only smaller tasks and if they become better and better at these tasks - "specialists". This means that the whole process is divided into smaller takss that the workers can specialize in.
Therefore the correct answer is
D. dividing labor into smaller specific tasks
When a parent pays for a child's piano lessons, he or she is engaged in "generalized reciprocity".
Generalized reciprocity is blessing giving without the desire of a quick return. For instance, on the off chance that you are shopping with a companion and you get him some espresso, you may anticipate that him will get you one consequently sooner or later. In any case, you would likely be somewhat affronted on the off chance that he demanded getting you some espresso while you got him one. To do as such would propose that he doesn't wish to end up associated with a proceeding with complementary trade with you. It might be said, it is a dismissal of your token of kinship.
