Answer:
Enduring sexual attraction toward members of either one's own sex or the other sex.
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
- A person's preference for having sex with people of the opposite sex (heterosexuality), people of the same sex (homosexuality), or people of both sexes are referred to as sexual orientation (bisexuality).
To learn more about it, refer
to brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
This event received or name of massacre due to violence or conflict.
This confrontation was a prelude to what will later become a war for independence. Although it has limited relevance, it has an important symbolism.
In this event the soldiers were exalted and nervous, after the nonviolent attitude of a civilian the violence began, which shows that the tension was great.
Answer: by using local property taxes to fund public schools, trapping poor children in poor schools
Explanation: Jonathan Kozol is an American writer, educator, and activist best known for his publications on public education in the United States. In savage inequalities, Kozol pointed out how students from poor family background are trapped in poorly funded schools since public school funding comes from local property taxes which vary widely between communities.
The basis of Kozol's argument is the comparisons between rich and poor school districts, in particular the amount of money spent per child. School districts with relatively wealthy property-owners are spending over $20,000 per year per child while school districts where poor people live spend about $11,000 per year per child.
The pertinent question he asks is whether it is fair or right that the place of one's birth or residence should determine the quality of education a child is entitled to.
Answer:
no effect of such instructions on jurors' decision-making in passing a guilty verdict.
Explanation:
Pretrial publicity has been known to influence judges decisions in the past. This has however been condemned with new techniques put in place for an thorough trial.
Studies testing the effectiveness of judge's instructions to the jury to disregard pretrial publicity has been found to have no effect of such instructions on jurors' decision-making in passing a guilty verdict.