Explanation:
13,200 Rent prepaid on January 1 for 1 year
÷ 12 Months
$ 1,100 Rent expense per month
Thus, $1,100 Rent expense per month
× 7 Months
$7,700 Rent expense for January through July
At July 31, Aiden's Tavern should record $ 7700 of rent expense.
Answer:
The correct answer is $1,836,742.42.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
EBIT = $373,000
Cost of equity = 13.2%
Tax rate = 35%
So, we can calculate the unlevered value of the firm by using following formula:
Unlevered value of the firm = EBIT × (1 - TAX RATE) ÷ COST OF EQUITY
By putting the value, we get
Unlevered value of the firm = $373,000 × ( 1 - 35%) ÷ 13.2%
= $373,000 × 0.65 ÷ 0.132
= $242,450 ÷ 0.132
= $1,836,742.42
Answer:
Non-controlling interest in net income decreased would have by $6,000
Explanation:
The computation of net income is shown below:-
Profit on Intra-Entity Sales = Revenue - Cost of goods sold
= $200,000 - $140,000
= $60,000
Profit on Intra-Entity Sales × 25% still in Ending Inventory
= $60,000 × 25%
= $15,000
Adjustment to Net Income × 40% for Non-controlling Interest
= $200,000 × 25% × 30% × 40%
= $6,000
Net profits will go decline by $6,000
I believe the answer is: Civil court
Civil court is the place where the justice department handle all cases that does not involve the infringement of the criminal laws.
The cases that come into this court would revolve around conflict between two legal citizens or organizations, such as conflict between employees and their workers, conflict between divorced couples, conflict between rent owners and tenants, etc.
Answer:
Proxy Fight
Explanation:
Proxy fight refers to that scenario wherein a group of shareholders coming together so as to gain more shareholder proxies and thus gain majority of the votes.
In such cases, outsiders convince the existing shareholders of a corporation to vote against the management and thus collectively lead to it's replacement.
This represents one of the common means of corporate takeover.
Disgruntled shareholders may unite against a management decision or any sort of oppressive policies by such means, usurp the existing management and appoint their own preferred candidates as their replacement.